Supreme Court Gets It Wrong With Its DUI…

Posted on by Defensive Driving Team | in Defensive Driving Tips

Missouri’s push to more easily draw blood from people suspected of driving drunk failed to convince U.S. Supreme Court justices Wednesday.

Law enforcement must continue to seek warrants to take blood from drivers stopped for possibly driving impaired, the court ruled in a case that originated in southeast Missouri.

More than 30 other states and the Obama administration had joined Missouri in asking justices to give officers almost complete discretion in drawing blood samples without a warrant.

The Supreme Court held that police usually must try to obtain a search warrant from a judge before ordering blood tests for drunken-driving suspects.

In their 8-1 ruling, justices sided with a Missouri man who had been subjected to a blood test without a warrant and was found to have nearly twice the legal limit of alcohol in his blood.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote for the court that the natural dissipation of alcohol in the blood is generally not sufficient reason to dispense with the requirement that police get a judge’s approval before drawing a blood sample.

The case stemmed from the Oct. 3, 2010, arrest of Tyler McNeely in rural Cape Girardeau County.

A state trooper stopped McNeely after he observed his car speeding and swerving. McNeely, who had two previous drunken-driving convictions, refused to submit to a breath test to measure the alcohol level in his body. He also failed several field sobriety tests.

The arresting officer, Cpl. Mark Winder of the Missouri Highway Patrol, said McNeely’s speech was slurred.

Winder did not attempt to get a warrant but drove McNeely to a hospital, where a technician drew his blood. McNeely’s blood alcohol content was 0.154 percent, well above the 0.08 percent legal limit.

After a circuit court threw out the test results, the Missouri Supreme Court upheld that action, saying that the blood test violated the Constitution. Police need a warrant to take a suspect’s blood except when a delay could threaten a life or destroy potential evidence, the Missouri court added.

Justice Mayor failed to list “the natural BAC  level.” which is .02…supposedly

The system isn’t a flawless one; however, both victims and DWI offenders have navigated these rules for justice for years. While I feel the punishments could be more severe for DUI offenders, the process of due process endorsed by the Supreme Court is an over reach. The process we currently have shouldn’t be turned upside down.  She failed to verify that in her decision.

 

The “natural” alcohol content in humans is .02 or under. Justice Sotomayor’s view,

and rises every hour for drinking alcohol’.  Not anywhere the suggested eight hours of

drinking in this case. The court’s ruling is flawed.

 

Doris Aiken, Founder/President

RID USA, inc.

|

Customer Reviews

Defensivedriving.com has a ShopperApproved rating of 4.7 based on 86855 ratings and reviews.

Craig TX, United States
So far the experience is straight forward and easy to understand.
james TX, United States
Great and easy experience.
Lauren United States
Great experience, easy to use
Kestin TX, United States
Very informative and not boring.
Stephanie
Quick and painless
Samantha
Great program for the money
Dustin
It’s been great!
Carol
Very easy
Sheila
Quick and easy to sign up for defense driving.
Kerry
Very simple
MANDA
Super easy
Brandon
Quick and easy.
Mansour
Easy and smooth
Lee TX, United States
Very convenient service.
Josef
Easy to sign up
Manuel
Quick and easy
Mia
awesome!
Erasmo
quick and efficient registration
K
quick and easy
Cooper
very easy!
Vajuiana
Easy, I loved it.
Alexis
Quick and easy
mary
really good
Melissa
Very easy!
See all reviews on shopperApproved.com
Why DefensiveDriving.com
  • 20 Years in Business
  • Over 2 Million Customers Served
  • Highest Possible Better Business Bureau Rating
  • Award Winning Course